Scientists have known for years that the Arctic has suffered from more warming than the rest of the world. But a new study shows that it’s much worse than previously thought.
Researchers have long estimated that the Arctic warms twice as fast as the rest of the world — a phenomenon known as Nature Communications Earth & Environment on Thursday found that it’s actually double that. The Arctic is warming nearly four times faster than anywhere else on Earth. In some areas of the Arctic Ocean, the warming rate is even up to seven times as fast.— but a new study published in
In this study, the research team “defined the Arctic properly,” with a latitude of 66.5ºN along the Arctic Circle, and calculated trends between 1979, when satellite data became available, and 2021, lead author Mika Rantanen said.
With those guidelines in place, they found that the Arctic is warming 3.7 to 4.1 times faster than the rest of Earth, depending on the dataset used.
The factors that cause more intense warming in the region have long been known. Sea ice, which helps reflect solar rays, has been shrinking, which leads the open ocean to absorb more radiation. That absorbed radiation then melts more ice and traps more heat, creating a devastating loop.
Scientists believe that Europe’s changing air pollution levels also played a role.
We report that the Arctic has warmed four times faster than the globe in the last 43 years.The four-fold Arctic amplification (AA) ratio is higher than what is generally reported in literature and media.2/13 pic.twitter.com/PxKIomnrH5
— Mika Rantanen (@mikarantane) August 11, 2022
The amplified rate of warming is strongest in the ocean and tends to be higher in the fall and winter, when sea ice is supposed to expand and heat is released back into the atmosphere. However, earlier this year, NASA found that ice growth in the Arctic Sea last fall and winter was at its 10th-lowest in the satellite record.
And regionally, Rantanen tweeted, “the warming has been even stronger.”
“Areas in the Barents Sea near Novaya Zemlya have warmed up to seven times the global average,” he wrote.
A separate study published this June found that the Barents Sea has seen “exceptional warming” of up to nearly 37 degrees Fahrenheit per decade over the last 20 to 40 years, a finding consistent with a .
So why had previous studies underestimated the Arctic’s warming? Rantanen and his team of researchers believe many other studies used “older, possibly outdated” estimates rather than recent observations.
The specific region of the Arctic also differentiated among studies, with used latitudes ranging from 60ºN to 70ºN, while in other studies, the Arctic wasn’t even defined based on latitude.
Additionally, researchers uncovered an issue with prediction models. Rantanen said that, as a group, climate models underestimate the true Arctic amplification.
“While the magnitude of Arctic amplification is dependent to some degree on how the Arctic region is defined, and by the period of time used in the calculation, the climate models were found to underestimate Arctic amplification almost independent of the definition,” Rantanen said in a press release.
Rantanen’s findings, which were first posted as a preprint in July 2021, echo NASA climate scientist Peter Jacobs’ report at the American Geophysical Union’s meeting in December 2021. As Jacobs explained at the time, the Arctic is defined by Earth’s tilt, which many past studies had neglected.
“Everybody knows [the Arctic] is a canary when it comes to climate change,” he told the journal Science. “Yet we’re misreporting it by a factor of two. Which is just bananas.”
As stated in the abstract of Jacobs’ presentation, changes in the Arctic have “profound implications” for the climate, humans and ecosystems.
“It is essential that the scientific community not only accurately understand but also convey the scale of Arctic warming,” the abstract reads, “which is occurring nearly twice as rapidly as commonly described.”