BOE’s Bailey Rejects QE Accusations, Slams Lords Committee

BOE’s Bailey Rejects QE Accusations, Slams Lords Committee

© Bloomberg. Andrew Bailey, governor of the Bank of England, poses for a photograph on his first day in the post at the central bank in the City of London, U.K., on Monday, March 16, 2020. Bailey knows a few things about crises, which should put him good stead on Monday when he takes the helm of the Bank of England as it tries to stave off recession triggered by the coronavirus pandemic.

(Bloomberg) — Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey rejected accusations that the central bank is improperly funding the government through the bond-buying program it revived to fight the economic damage from the coronavirus.

Bailey also criticized a House of Lords committee for comments the BOE was “addicted” to quantitative easing, saying it was a “poor choice of language.”

“You can’t discriminate among borrowers,” Bailey said of QE in response to a question about the Lords report. “Every borrower benefits from it, and every borrower includes the government. We’re not doing it for the government. It’s the yield curve. It’s there and all borrowers are on the same yield curve.”

Bailey has repeatedly rejected the idea that the BOE is conducting monetary financing — the direct funding of governments by central banks — or that it should go down that path. The central bank on Thursday published new guidance on how it would unwind QE, saying it will start once its benchmark rate reaches 0.5%. That’s lower than the previous guidance of 1.5%, suggesting that the exit will start sooner.

Bailey’s comments come just weeks after the publication of a report by the Lords Economic Affairs Committee, “Quantitative easing: a dangerous addiction?” The group, which includes Mervyn King, BOE governor when QE was originally introduced, said the central bank must be more transparent about the policy and justify its usage.“I’m afraid I’m going to be very, very blunt,” Bailey said. “The House of Lords should not use word ‘addicted.’ Frankly that is a word that has a damaging meaning for many people who are suffering. I think it is wrong to use that word loosely.”

©2021 Bloomberg L.P.

Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.

Latest Category Posts